Monday, November 28, 2011

Estate Planning Basics (Transferring Real Property to your Children)

By Siesta-friendly

It is not uncommon to be asked what parents can do to save on taxes when they transfer real property to their children.  There are 3 options: a) donating them, b) selling them, 3) converting them into shares of stock and transferring the shares, to their children.   

Choice c) is best made when there are several properties involved and when the parent still wants control over the properties. Although a property for shares transaction is tax-free, taxes shall be imposed once the shares are transferred to the children (but they will be lower than taxes applicable to donation or sale of property). Plus. there are compliance requirements that have to be factored in, like the periodic filings with the SEC and the BIR.

If there are only a few properties involved and the parent deems it best to already dispose of them amongst the children (provided they are already of legal age), the better alternatives are donation or sale.  The taxes payable as regards the donation or sale of real property depend on the value of the property involved. Note that since the property is now vested in the names of the children, they can do whatever they want with the property.  If they are already married, sometimes this lead to some difficulties for the donor-parents.  This is particularly so if the donees are governed by the absolute community of property regime (meaning, the wife becomes co-owner of the property) as is usually the case if they were married under the Family Code.

Consider: if the donor-parent already transfers the property where he is residing and intends to reside until his death, then he no longer has control over it once he loses ownership of it. What if the child/children mortgage the property and lose it? Parents may want to make it easy for their children once they die but they have to be practical in their own favor too while they are still alive.

Tax payable by donor of real property

Under Sec. 99 of the Tax Code, the tax shall be computed in accordance with the following schedule:

If the gift is valued:
 
Over
But Not Over
The Tax Shall be
Plus
Of the Excess Over

P 100,000
Exempt


P 100,000
200,000
0
2%
P100,000
200,000
500,000
2,000
4%
200,000
500,000
1,000,000
14,000
6%
500,000
1,000,000
3,000,000
44,000
8%
1,000,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
204,000
10%
3,000,000
5,000,000
10,000,000
404,000
12%
5,000,000
10,000,000

1,004,000
15%
10,000,000
 
A donor has to make sure, however, that the donations do not prejudice the legitime of the other heirs.

Capital Gains Tax on Sale of Real Property

Under Sec 24 D), a final tax of 6% based on the gross selling price or current fair market value or the property, whichever is higher, shall be imposed upon capital gains presumed to have been realized from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of real property located in the Philippines.

Estate (Inheritance) Tax

Of course, if you don’t care much about your children, you can either donate everything to the government tax-free or, still leave everything to your children but let them pay for the more oppressive estate taxes under Sec. 84 -

If the net estate is:
 
Over
But Not Over
The Tax shall be
Plus
Of the Excess Over

P 200,000
Exempt


P 200,000
550,000
0
5%
P 200,000
500,000
2,000,000
P 15,000
8%
500,000
2,000,000
5,000,000
135,000
11%
2,000,000
5,000,000
10,000,000
465,000
15%
5,000,000
10,000,000
And Over
1,215,000
20%
10,000,000

Why think of these things?  As they say, you can’t take it with you when you go, so you might as well plan for it.


NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

FAST PUNCHERS (The argument in favor of using Hawk-Eye type technology in boxing matches)

By Siesta-friendly

Hawk-eye camera-based technology has been used in international tennis matches (including 3 Grand Slam events) and international cricket matches for a few years now. It’s already being developed for goal scoring accuracy in football. Perhaps it should be developed in boxing as well.

At the moment, there is an existing computer technology used in boxing to determine punch statistics – called Compubox – which the owner, Bob Canobbio, describes succinctly:

“The way it works is there are two operators. They share a laptop computer. They pick one fighter each. There are four keys for each operator. Jab connect, Jab miss, Power connect, Power miss. We call a non jab a power punch for lack of a better description. I know some people who really don’t really understand the program have said in the past, “How can a guy land 300 power punches and not knock the guy out?” Well we call it power punch because it sounds better than non jab.”[1]


Bob and Nic Canobbio Ringside (from http://compuboxonline.com/bio.php)

It would seem that at least half (the Mexican half) of the people who watched the Pacquiao-Marquez boxing match last November 10, 2011 thought that Juan Manuel Marquez won the fight hands down.  Maybe even half of the Filipinos who watched the match thought the same.

Yet, many doubters would have surely changed their minds following reports of the stats revealed by Compubox below (click to enlarge):



Who knew, right?  Marquez’s punches were so convincing and yet … well the stats speak for themselves. Pacquiao’s fists are apparently too fast for the non-ringside audience.

But, because the Compubox punch stats are inputted manually, perhaps camera-based technology can be developed so as to be officially accepted in determining points as has been done in international tennis and cricket matches.  Manual punching of stats depends on the concentration of the operators in seeing the punches and their punching the correct keys. 

In any case, the judges have spoken but maybe next time, the number of punches objectively and scientifically counted will have the final say, not the pundits and armchair boxers. “The More (punches) the Manny- er!”


P.S.
Perhaps the same camera-based technology can also enlighten boxing officials to penalize boxers who – consciously or not - repeatedly try to impede their opponents by stepping on the latter’s foot while punching or avoiding them –




[1] Perry, K. (2007, February 25). Fight report exclusive-compubox interview. Retrieved from http://www.fightreport.net/?p=958


NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST